Tau3-Banking — Mercor evaluation (Tau3-Banking (Mercor))
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
Handling simulated banking-support conversations with tools. This table shows Mercor-run configurations for reference and is excluded from model rankings.
Evaluation results published by Mercor. Published evaluation aggregates only; task contents and dataset license grants are not included.
Pass@1 on Tau3-Banking (Mercor) — October 15, 2026 capture
We mirror the published pass@1 view for Tau3-Banking (Mercor). Opus 5.5 leads the public snapshot at 55.00%, followed by Fable 5.1 (54.00%) and Sonnet 5.5 (54.00%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.
Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Tau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoning
Published margin ±8.2 · 291 reported samples
Fable 5.1
Anthropic
Tau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoning
Published margin ±8.9 · 291 reported samples
Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
Tau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoning
Published margin ±8.9 · 291 reported samples
26 configurationsAgenticDated Mercor configurationsDisplay onlyUpdated October 15, 2026 capture
Pass@1 table (26 configurations)
| Rank | Model / configuration | Score | Parameters (B) | Open / closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Opus 5.5AnthropicTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.2 · 291 reported samples | 55.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 2 | Fable 5.1AnthropicTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.9 · 291 reported samples | 54.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 3 | Sonnet 5.5AnthropicTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.9 · 291 reported samples | 54.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 4 | Muse Spark 1.3MetaTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±8.6 · 291 reported samples | 52.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 5 | Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogleTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · high reasoningPublished margin ±8.8 · 291 reported samples | 48.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 6 | GPT-6 AstraOpenAITau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±9.1 · 291 reported samples | 46.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 7 | Qwen3.8-MaxAlibabaTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±8.4 · 291 reported samples | 46.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 8 | Grok 4.6xAITau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±8.2 · 291 reported samples | 45.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 9 | Opus 5AnthropicTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.1 · 291 reported samples | 44.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 10 | GPT-6 SolOpenAITau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.6 · 291 reported samples | 43.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 11 | GPT-5.6 Sol (Pro)OpenAITau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.2 · 291 reported samples | 43.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 12 | GPT-6.1 SolOpenAITau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.9 · 291 reported samples | 43.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 13 | Haiku 5.5AnthropicTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.6 · 291 reported samples | 43.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 14 | GLM-5.3ZhipuTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.1 · 291 reported samples | 40.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 15 | GPT-6 LunaOpenAITau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.2 · 291 reported samples | 40.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 16 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeekTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.1 · 291 reported samples | 40.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 17 | GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAITau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.1 · 291 reported samples | 38.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 18 | GLM-5.3-FlashZhipuTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±7.6 · 291 reported samples | 37.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 19 | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeekTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±8.4 · 291 reported samples | 37.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 20 | GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAITau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±7.9 · 291 reported samples | 35.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 21 | Kimi K3KimiTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · max reasoningPublished margin ±7.6 · 291 reported samples | 34.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 22 | Grok 4.7xAITau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±7.6 · 291 reported samples | 32.60% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 23 | MiniMax-M3MiniMaxTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · high reasoningPublished margin ±6.2 · 291 reported samples | 21.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 24 | Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogleTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · high reasoningPublished margin ±6 · 291 reported samples | 18.60% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 25 | Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIATau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · high reasoningPublished margin ±6 · 291 reported samples | 18.60% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 26 | InklingThinking MachinesTau half-duplex agent (200 max steps, 10 tool error limit, 3 hour time limit) · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.8 · 291 reported samples | 15.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
How to read this Mercor evaluation
We captured Mercor's Tau3-Banking results on October 15, 2026. The table preserves 26 published configurations, their source identifiers, reasoning settings, and disclosed pass@1 values. These are results from Mercor's evaluation setup; we did not rerun them.
This dated source table is display only and does not enter overall or category rankings. Source configurations retain their external identity, including Pro descriptors and different effort settings.
The headline is the source page's selected Pass@1 metric. The task set, harness, tools, and grader belong to this Mercor run and may differ from another evaluator's results.
The row labels retain published error margins and sample counts when supplied. Missing margins and counts remain unreported; a sample count is not used to reconstruct a task denominator. Except where the dedicated source defines an interval, the confidence level is unreported. Equal displayed scores and overlapping margins do not establish statistical ties. Capture time does not establish individual evaluation dates.
The general methodology lists programmatic database-state checks and agent action checks; one llm-judged natural-language assertion and a judge of Gemini 3.5 Flash. Its run-count label is k = 3. The linked result page takes precedence where its setup differs, as noted above.
Snapshot
The published Tau3-Banking (Mercor) snapshot places Opus 5.5 first at 55.00%. The third row is 1.00 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 12.00 points, so the table still separates the published systems.
26 configurations are shown for Tau3-Banking (Mercor). The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. Tau3-Banking (Mercor) is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
About Tau3-Banking (Mercor)
Tasks
97 source-reported tasks
Format
Pass@1
Difficulty
Source-specific evaluation
The selected headline is Pass@1. Source model identifiers, effort settings, published margins, and reported sample counts remain attached to the source configuration. Public-set results and Mercor task extensions occupy separate tables.
Freshness and provenance
Version
Tau3-Banking; Mercor Pass@1
Refresh cadence
Reviewed dated source capture
Staleness state
Dated Mercor configurations
Question availability
Upstream task access and terms; only aggregate results mirrored
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does Tau3-Banking (Mercor) measure?
Handling simulated banking-support conversations with tools. This table shows Mercor-run configurations for reference and is excluded from model rankings.
Which model leads the published Tau3-Banking (Mercor) snapshot?
Opus 5.5 currently leads the published Tau3-Banking (Mercor) snapshot with 55.00% pass@1. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.
How many models are evaluated on Tau3-Banking (Mercor)?
The October 15, 2026 capture snapshot contains 26 source configurations.
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 5,600+ readers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.