Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

OSWorld 2.1 (all 108 tasks) (OSWorld 2.1)

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

OSWorld 2.1 is the current release of OSWorld 2.0: the same 108 long-horizon computer-use workflows with the maintainers' later fixes to task files, assets, mocked websites, and evaluators. This page stores partial scores on the full task set.

Previous release

OSWorld 2.0 results on the June and August 2026 releases remain on their own page. Version 2.1 fixes evaluators and task assets, so movement between the two tables is not a like-for-like model comparison. The 82-task offline subset has a separate page.

View OSWorld 2.0

Benchmark score on OSWorld 2.1 — October 27, 2026

We compile the OSWorld 2.1 rows from provider self-reports. Claude Opus 5.5 leads the table at 81.8%, followed by Claude Fable 5.1 (80.7%) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (80.1%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

9 modelsAgenticCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated October 27, 2026

Benchmark score table (9 models)

Benchmark score results for OSWorld 2.1
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
81.8%
Not reportedClosed
2Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
80.7%
Not reportedClosed
3Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
80.1%
Not reportedClosed
4Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
79.6%
Not reportedPending
5Muse Wonder FullMeta
78.4%
Not reportedClosed
6GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
75.8%
Not reportedClosed
7Claude Opus 5Anthropic
74.0%
Not reportedClosed
8Muse WonderMeta
72.6%
Not reportedClosed
9Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
57.0%
Not reportedClosed

Among the reported OSWorld 2.1 rows, Claude Opus 5.5 is first at 81.8%. The third row is 1.7 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 24.8 points, so the table still separates the published systems.

9 models have been evaluated on OSWorld 2.1. The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. OSWorld 2.1 is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About OSWorld 2.1

Year

2026

Tasks

108 long-horizon computer-use workflows

Format

Interactive computer-use evaluation; partial score

Difficulty

Long-horizon professional workflows

The osworld-v2.1 release pins task files, gated assets, mocked websites, and the Ubuntu VM image for reproducible runs and adds an offline task subset. Labs report a partial score (mean per-task checkpoint credit) and a strict pass rate; we store the partial score, the metric every source here publishes, and keep strict pass rates in the source notes. Runs use each lab's own harness, so treat gaps of a few points as unresolved. Results on the earlier OSWorld 2.0 releases stay on the OSWorld 2.0 page, and the 82-task offline subset has its own page.

Freshness and provenance

Version

OSWorld 2.1 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

How is OSWorld 2.1 different from OSWorld 2.0?

OSWorld 2.1 is the maintainers' current release of OSWorld 2.0. It keeps the 108 workflows but fixes task evaluators, assets, and mocked websites, so its scores are not like-for-like with results on the June or August 2026 OSWorld 2.0 releases. Those results stay on the OSWorld 2.0 page.

Why is the offline subset on a separate page?

The offline subset runs 82 of the 108 tasks with no internet access in the agent's virtual machine. Anthropic reports Claude Sonnet 5.5 at 80.1% on all 108 tasks and 83.9% on the offline subset, so mixing the two would distort the comparison.

Last updated: October 27, 2026 · BenchLM version OSWorld 2.1 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 6,100+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.