Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

A code-comprehension benchmark covering production repositories across Go, Python, C, and TypeScript.

Benchmark score on SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA — October 17, 2026

We compile the SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA rows from provider self-reports. Ling 3.1 Flash leads the table at 64.5%, followed by Muse Spark 1.3 (59.4%) and Muse Spark Open (58.0%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

6 modelsCodingCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated October 17, 2026

Benchmark score table (6 models)

Benchmark score results for SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Ling 3.1 FlashInclusionAI
64.5%
Not reportedOpen
2Muse Spark 1.3Meta
59.4%
Not reportedClosed
3Muse Spark OpenMeta
58.0%
Not reportedOpen
4Beam 1.0 501B-A23B FP8Reflection AI
32.2%
Not reportedOpen
5Beam 1.0 501B-A23BReflection AI
31.8%
Not reportedOpen
6Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4Reflection AI
31.4%
Not reportedOpen

Among the reported SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA rows, Ling 3.1 Flash is first at 64.5%. The third row is 6.5 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 33.1 points, so the table still separates the published systems.

6 models have been evaluated on SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA. The benchmark falls in the Coding category. SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA

Year

2026

Tasks

124 codebase questions across 11 repositories

Format

Mean pass@1

Difficulty

Production codebase comprehension

The public QnA split contains 124 tasks across 11 repositories. Meta uses mini-swe-agent and task-specific rubric grading under Scale AI's leaderboard protocol; the provider-run row stays display-only.

Freshness and provenance

Version

SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA measure?

A code-comprehension benchmark covering production repositories across Go, Python, C, and TypeScript.

Which model scores highest on SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA?

Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI currently leads with a score of 64.5% on SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA.

How many models are evaluated on SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA?

6 AI models have published results on SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA in the BenchLM catalog.

Last updated: October 17, 2026 · BenchLM version SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.