All DeepSeek models ranked by benchmark performance.
Unless noted otherwise, ranking surfaces on this page use BenchLM's provisional leaderboard lane rather than the stricter sourced-only verified leaderboard.
Bottom line: DeepSeek models are open-weight and free or nearly free. DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads the lineup. Strong on math and reasoning, competitive with mid-tier proprietary models.
According to BenchLM.ai, DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads this ranking with a score of 65, followed by DeepSeek V3.2 (60) and DeepSeek Coder 2.0 (53). There is a significant gap between the leading models and the rest of the field.
All models in this ranking are open-weight, meaning they can be self-hosted for maximum control and cost efficiency.
This ranking is based on provisional overall weighted scores across BenchLM.ai's scoring formula tracked by BenchLM.ai. For detailed model profiles, click any model name below. To compare two specific models head-to-head, use the "vs #" links.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
DeepSeek · 128K
Best DeepSeek model. Reasoning variant with strongest knowledge and agentic.
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek · 128K
Strong non-reasoning option. Leads on math and multilingual.
DeepSeek Coder 2.0
DeepSeek · 128K
Coding specialist. Good value for code generation tasks.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) leads DeepSeek's lineup — best on knowledge (70) and agentic (69).
DeepSeek V3.2 non-reasoning variant with strong math (71) and multilingual (69).
DeepSeek Coder 2.0 coding-focused with strong math (71) and agentic (65).
Get notified when models move. One email a week with what changed and why.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The top model is DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) by DeepSeek with a provisional score of 65.
The best open-weight model is DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) at position #1.
9 models are included in this ranking.
Models are ranked by the same overall BenchLM score used across all leaderboards. Comparing within DeepSeek's lineup helps identify which model fits your use case and budget.
This page only shows DeepSeek models. Cross-provider comparison requires the overall or category-specific leaderboards. Newer models may have limited benchmark coverage initially.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.