Skip to main content
Radar

Keep up with the models you depend on. Follow price changes, retirements, and API updates.Follow the models you depend on.

Follow model changes
BenchLM
Model A
Atria Dawn Preview

Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

—

Evidence status unavailable

90% interval unavailable

Atria Dawn Preview vs LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Updated September 14, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.

LiquidAI logo
Model B
LFM2.5-8B-A1B

LiquidAI

39.11/100

Estimated · Public rank #193

90% interval 27.6–50.6

Decision reading

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.

1 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Share or export

Share on XLinkedInSocial cardCSVJSON

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    Atria Dawn Preview

    Atria Dawn Preview has the larger documented context window.

    Confidence: documented

Show secondary and unsupported calls

  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    Not enough matched evidence

    LFM2.5-8B-A1B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

    Confidence: limited

  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    Not enough matched evidence

    Atria Dawn Preview and LFM2.5-8B-A1B are scored on Estimated evidence for agentic, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like.

    Confidence: limited

  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    The page does not recommend a cost winner because at least one model cannot fit the stated workload in one request. LFM2.5-8B-A1B does not fit this workload in one request. Atria Dawn Preview has no comparable published API token rate. LFM2.5-8B-A1B has no comparable published API token rate.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

Shared results
1
Atria Dawn Preview only
12
LFM2.5-8B-A1B only
6
Like-for-like categories
0 / 8

1 category rests on Estimated evidence or different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.

Agentic

Directional only
Atria Dawn Preview
57.9
Estimated · #31/153
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
43.5
Estimated · #97/153
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 11 vs 2 public rows
Reading
Directional only

Coding

Not comparable
Atria Dawn Preview
51.6
Estimated · #51/152
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 2 vs 0 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Reasoning

Not comparable
Atria Dawn Preview
Not ranked
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
21.0
Unranked · 2 rankable rows
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Knowledge

Not comparable
Atria Dawn Preview
Not ranked
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
34.5
Supported · #163/183
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 0 vs 0 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
Atria Dawn Preview
Not ranked
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
27.7
Unranked · 3 rankable rows
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
Atria Dawn Preview
Not ranked
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable
Atria Dawn Preview
Not ranked
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable
Atria Dawn Preview
Not ranked
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
44.7
#94/123
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

A shared-evidence shape is not available.

BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Atria Dawn Preview
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request

Atria Dawn Preview has no comparable published API token rate. LFM2.5-8B-A1B has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Atria Dawn Preview
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request

Atria Dawn Preview has no comparable published API token rate. LFM2.5-8B-A1B has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Atria Dawn Preview
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Does not fit in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable

LFM2.5-8B-A1B does not fit this workload in one request. Atria Dawn Preview has no comparable published API token rate. LFM2.5-8B-A1B has no comparable published API token rate.

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

Atria Dawn Preview

No comparable hosted API rate

Atria Dawn Preview model card

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

No comparable hosted API rate

Documented inputs

Atria Dawn Preview

Not sourced

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Not sourced

Documented outputs

Atria Dawn Preview

Not sourced

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Not sourced

Provider availability

Atria Dawn Preview

Not sourced

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

Atria Dawn Preview

Reasoning

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Reasoning

Weight access

Atria Dawn Preview

Open Weight

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Open Weight

License

Atria Dawn Preview

Open Weight

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Open Weight

Release date

Atria Dawn Preview

2026-09-14

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

2026-05-28

If you already use one of these models
Deployment change
The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
Workload cost
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff
Atria Dawn Preview has the larger documented window (256K).

Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence19 rows

Agentic

  • AutomationBench

    Atria Dawn Preview53.8%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • BFCL v4

    Atria Dawn Preview77.0%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B49.7%
    Source

    Atria Dawn Preview leads this result

  • CyberGym

    Atria Dawn Preview86.5%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • DeepSearchQA

    Atria Dawn Preview96.0%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • BrowseComp

    Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • skillsBench

    Atria Dawn Preview66.4%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • MLE-Bench Lite

    Atria Dawn Preview86.2%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • WideResearch

    Atria Dawn Preview81.9%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • τ³-bench results

    Atria Dawn Preview41.2%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    Atria Dawn Preview78.3%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • JobBench

    Atria Dawn Preview50.3%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • τ²-bench results

    Atria Dawn Preview—
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B88.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Coding

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    Atria Dawn Preview78.3%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-bench Pro

    Atria Dawn Preview59.6%
    Source
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B—

    Not directly comparable

Math

  • MATH-500

    Atria Dawn Preview—
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B88.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • AIME 2025

    Atria Dawn Preview—
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B42.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • AIME26

    Atria Dawn Preview—
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B50.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Instruction following

  • IFEval

    Atria Dawn Preview—
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B91.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • IFBench

    Atria Dawn Preview—
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B56.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or LFM2.5-8B-A1B?

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.

Which is better for coding, Atria Dawn Preview or LFM2.5-8B-A1B?

LFM2.5-8B-A1B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Atria Dawn Preview or LFM2.5-8B-A1B?

Atria Dawn Preview scores higher for agentic tasks on the public lane, 57.9 to 43.5. Atria Dawn Preview and LFM2.5-8B-A1B are scored on Estimated evidence for agentic tasks, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like. BenchLM does not name a winner for agentic tasks from a directional reading; read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.

Which costs less, Atria Dawn Preview or LFM2.5-8B-A1B?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, Atria Dawn Preview or LFM2.5-8B-A1B?

Atria Dawn Preview has the larger documented context window: 256K, compared with 128K.

Related comparisons

Compare API pricing Read the methodology Open the model selector

Last updated September 14, 2026

Watch Atria Dawn Preview vs LFM2.5-8B-A1B

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.