Model comparison
Celeris-1 vs Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Celeris-1 unranked (Not scored); Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking #184 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Celeris-1 and Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Celeris-1; 9 to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking.
Updated July 24, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Celeris-1 only
- 1
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
- 9
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Celeris-1 and Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 8K for Celeris-1.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Celeris-1$2 input / $6 output | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Celeris-1Not available | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Celeris-1Not available | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Celeris-18K | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking200K | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Celeris-1 | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 71.4% | Not comparable |
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Celeris-1 | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 40.9% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge4 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Celeris-1 | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 67.9% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Celeris-1 | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 55.4% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Celeris-1 and Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Celeris-1 and Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking today?
Celeris-1: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.