Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

21.39/100
Margin
38.1pts
winning →
59.5/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Haiku #194 (Supported); Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) #56 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Claude 3 Haiku; 5 to Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
12
Claude 3 Haiku only
0
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is priced at $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens for Claude 3 Haiku. Claude 3 Haiku has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Haiku$0.25 input / $1.25 outputQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3.6 outputClaude 3 Haiku has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 Haiku138 tok/sQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 Haiku1.16 sQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Haiku200KQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)128KClaude 3 Haiku lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 21.1%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 19.9%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 15.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 23.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 962Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-SciCodeSource 18.6%42.0%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Coding IndexSource 48.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 21.0%65.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 0.0%1.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 3.9%33.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 37.4%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 3.9%27.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -47.6%-29.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.2%31.4%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.2%89.1%Claude 3 Haiku leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 30.8%77.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 36.1%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) today?

Claude 3 Haiku: $0.25 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.