Head-to-head comparison across 0benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking
43
Claude Fable 5
96
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking unranked · Claude Fable 5 #2
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Claude Fable 5 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking
Claude Fable 5
$null / $null
$10 / $50
29 t/s
N/A
15.00s
N/A
200K
1M+
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Claude Fable 5 is coming soon on BenchLM.
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Claude Fable 5 has the larger context window at 1M+, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking.
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable Claude Fable 5: $10.00 input / $50.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.