Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs DeepSeek LLM 2.0

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 wins overall with a score of 63 vs 29 (34 point difference).DeepSeek LLM 2.0 wins 4 out of 4 categories.

Knowledge

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking

35.8

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

76.8

38
MMLU
79
37
GPQA
78
35
SuperGPQA
76
33
OpenBookQA
74

Coding

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking

30

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

73

30
HumanEval
73

Mathematics

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking

37

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

79

38
AIME 2023
80
40
AIME 2024
82
39
AIME 2025
81
34
HMMT Feb 2023
76
36
HMMT Feb 2024
78
35
HMMT Feb 2025
77
37
BRUMO 2025
79

Reasoning

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking

35

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

76

36
SimpleQA
77
34
MuSR
75

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking or DeepSeek LLM 2.0?

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 scores higher overall with 63 vs 29, a difference of 34 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking or DeepSeek LLM 2.0?

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 76.8 vs 35.8.

Which is better for coding, Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking or DeepSeek LLM 2.0?

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 leads in coding with an average score of 73 vs 30.

Which is better for math, Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking or DeepSeek LLM 2.0?

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 leads in math with an average score of 79 vs 37.

Which is better for reasoning, Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking or DeepSeek LLM 2.0?

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 leads in reasoning with an average score of 76 vs 35.