Model comparison
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs DeepSeek LLM 2.0
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking #184 (Supported); DeepSeek LLM 2.0 #89 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and DeepSeek LLM 2.0 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 9 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking; 0 to DeepSeek LLM 2.0.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
- 9
- DeepSeek LLM 2.0 only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and DeepSeek LLM 2.0 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for DeepSeek LLM 2.0 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek LLM 2.0.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | DeepSeek LLM 2.0 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot available | DeepSeek LLM 2.0$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/s | DeepSeek LLM 2.0Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 s | DeepSeek LLM 2.0Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking200K | DeepSeek LLM 2.0128K | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | DeepSeek LLM 2.0 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 71.4% | — | Not comparable |
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | DeepSeek LLM 2.0 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 40.9% | — | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge3 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | DeepSeek LLM 2.0 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 67.9% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | DeepSeek LLM 2.0 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 55.4% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and DeepSeek LLM 2.0 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and DeepSeek LLM 2.0 today?
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable DeepSeek LLM 2.0: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.