Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs GPT-5.2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 8 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

36.55/100
Margin
21.9pts
winning →
OpenAI
58.43/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking #184 (Supported); GPT-5.2 #64 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-5.2 share 8 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking; 20 to GPT-5.2.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
8
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
1
GPT-5.2 only
20
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-5.2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 8 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.2 has the larger context window at 400K, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-5.2
CategoryClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingΔGPT-5.2
AgenticClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.255.7
CodingClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.270.6
ReasoningClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.252.9
KnowledgeClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.292.4
MathClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.235.2
MultimodalClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.280.4

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot availableGPT-5.2$1.75 input / $14 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/sGPT-5.273 tok/sGPT-5.2 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 sGPT-5.2130.34 sClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking200KGPT-5.2400KGPT-5.2 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.2Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 71.4%84.8%GPT-5.2 leads
BrowseCompSource 65.8%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 47.3%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.54%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 34.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.2Result
AA-SciCodeSource 40.9%52.1%GPT-5.2 leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 80%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 55.6%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 53.50%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.2Result
AA-LCRSource 66.3%72.7%GPT-5.2 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%11.6%GPT-5.2 leads
ARC-AGI-2Source 52.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%42.2%GPT-5.2 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 80.9%90.3%GPT-5.2 leads
AA-HLESource 11.9%35.4%GPT-5.2 leads
GPQASource 92.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -1.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 43.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 79.7%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.2Result
AA AIME 2025Source 99.0%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 40.700%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.800%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.2Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 67.9%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 79.5%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 83.0%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82.1%Not comparable
V*Source 75.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1227Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGPT-5.2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 55.4%75.4%GPT-5.2 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-5.2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and GPT-5.2 today?

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable GPT-5.2: $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.