Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs Grok Code Fast 1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 8 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

36.55/100
Margin
2.1pts
winning →
38.64/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking #184 (Supported); Grok Code Fast 1 #180 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Grok Code Fast 1 share 8 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking; 4 to Grok Code Fast 1.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
8
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
1
Grok Code Fast 1 only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Grok Code Fast 1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 8 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok Code Fast 1 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Grok Code Fast 1
CategoryClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingΔGrok Code Fast 1
CodingClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 170.8

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGrok Code Fast 1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot availableGrok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/sGrok Code Fast 1172 tok/sGrok Code Fast 1 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 sGrok Code Fast 12.81 sGrok Code Fast 1 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking200KGrok Code Fast 1256KGrok Code Fast 1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGrok Code Fast 1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 71.4%75.7%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGrok Code Fast 1Result
AA-SciCodeSource 40.9%36.2%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 70.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGrok Code Fast 1Result
AA-LCRSource 66.3%48.3%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGrok Code Fast 1Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%21.6%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 80.9%72.7%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA-HLESource 11.9%7.5%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -36.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 23.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGrok Code Fast 1Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 67.9%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingGrok Code Fast 1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 55.4%41.4%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Grok Code Fast 1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Grok Code Fast 1 today?

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.