Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs Mistral Large 2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 8 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

36.55/100
Margin
5.2pts
winning →
41.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking #184 (Supported); Mistral Large 2 #163 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Mistral Large 2 share 8 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking; 3 to Mistral Large 2.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
8
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
1
Mistral Large 2 only
3
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Mistral Large 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 8 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 2.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingMistral Large 2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot availableMistral Large 2Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/sMistral Large 238 tok/sMistral Large 2 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 sMistral Large 21.45 sMistral Large 2 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking200KMistral Large 2128KClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingMistral Large 2Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 71.4%30.7%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingMistral Large 2Result
AA-SciCodeSource 40.9%29.2%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingMistral Large 2Result
AA-LCRSource 66.3%5.3%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingMistral Large 2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%9.2%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 80.9%48.6%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA-HLESource 11.9%4.0%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -34.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 20.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 67.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingMistral Large 2Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 67.9%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingMistral Large 2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 55.4%31.2%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Mistral Large 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Mistral Large 2 today?

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable Mistral Large 2: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.