Model comparison
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs Nemotron Ultra 253B
Head-to-head evidence from 8 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking #184 (Supported); Nemotron Ultra 253B #150 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Nemotron Ultra 253B share 8 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking; 3 to Nemotron Ultra 253B.
Updated July 20, 2026- Shared results
- 8
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
- 1
- Nemotron Ultra 253B only
- 3
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Nemotron Ultra 253B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 8 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for Nemotron Ultra 253B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot available | Nemotron Ultra 253B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/s | Nemotron Ultra 253BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 s | Nemotron Ultra 253BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking200K | Nemotron Ultra 253B32K | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 71.4% | 11.4% | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads |
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 40.9% | 34.7% | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 33.7% | 9.1% | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 80.9% | 72.8% | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads |
| AA-HLESource | 11.9% | 8.1% | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -45.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 19.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 81.7% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 67.9% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 55.4% | 38.2% | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Nemotron Ultra 253B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Nemotron Ultra 253B today?
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable Nemotron Ultra 253B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.