Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs Qwen2.5-VL-32B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

Qwen2.5-VL-32B wins overall with a score of 34 vs 29 (5 point difference).Qwen2.5-VL-32B wins 4 out of 4 categories.

Knowledge

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking

35.8

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

40.8

38
MMLU
43
37
GPQA
42
35
SuperGPQA
40
33
OpenBookQA
38

Coding

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking

30

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

35

30
HumanEval
35

Mathematics

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking

37

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

42

38
AIME 2023
43
40
AIME 2024
45
39
AIME 2025
44
34
HMMT Feb 2023
39
36
HMMT Feb 2024
41
35
HMMT Feb 2025
40
37
BRUMO 2025
42

Reasoning

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking

35

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

40

36
SimpleQA
41
34
MuSR
39

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

Qwen2.5-VL-32B scores higher overall with 34 vs 29, a difference of 5 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

Qwen2.5-VL-32B leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 40.8 vs 35.8.

Which is better for coding, Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

Qwen2.5-VL-32B leads in coding with an average score of 35 vs 30.

Which is better for math, Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

Qwen2.5-VL-32B leads in math with an average score of 42 vs 37.

Which is better for reasoning, Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

Qwen2.5-VL-32B leads in reasoning with an average score of 40 vs 35.