Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Claude 4 Sonnet is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 61 to 57. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Pick Claude 4 Sonnet if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Claude 4 Sonnet
56.5
MiniMax M2.7
57
Claude 4 Sonnet
46.6
MiniMax M2.7
56.2
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Claude 4 Sonnet is ahead overall, 61 to 57. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 48% and 56.2%.
MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 56.2 versus 46.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 57 versus 56.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.