Skip to main content

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Fable 5

96

VS

Gemini 3.5 Flash

86

4 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Fable 5 #2 · Gemini 3.5 Flash #10

Pick Claude Fable 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3.5 Flash only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Fable 5
85.2vs77.2

+8.0 difference

Coding

Claude Fable 5
85.6vs54.5

+31.1 difference

Knowledge

Claude Fable 5
74.8vs58

+16.8 difference

Multimodal

Claude Fable 5
92.4vs83.8

+8.6 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Fable 5

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Price (per 1M tokens)

$10 / $50

$1.5 / $9

Speed

N/A

284.2 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

18.55s

Context Window

1M+

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Fable 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3.5 Flash only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Claude Fable 5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 96 to 86. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Fable 5's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 85.6 against 54.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 80% to 55.1%.

Claude Fable 5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $10.00 input / $50.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.50 input / $9.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash. That is roughly 5.6x on output cost alone. Claude Fable 5 gives you the larger context window at 1M+, compared with 1M for Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Fable 5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 96 to 86. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 80% and 55.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Fable 5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 58. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Fable 5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 85.6 versus 54.5. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Fable 5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 85.2 versus 77.2. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Fable 5 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 83.8. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 9, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.