Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

56.58/100
Margin
3.2pts
winning →
59.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 #77 (Estimated); GLM-5 (Reasoning) #52 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Claude Haiku 4.5; 1 to GLM-5 (Reasoning).

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
4
GLM-5 (Reasoning) only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is priced at $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens for GLM-5 (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM-5 (Reasoning)
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5ΔGLM-5 (Reasoning)
CodingClaude Haiku 4.573.3MarginNo overlapGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not measured
MathClaude Haiku 4.54.9MarginNo overlapGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-5 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Haiku 4.5$1 input / $5 outputGLM-5 (Reasoning)$1 input / $3.2 outputGLM-5 (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Haiku 4.5Not availableGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Haiku 4.5Not availableGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Haiku 4.5200KGLM-5 (Reasoning)200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
JobBenchSource 16.0%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.3%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 23.36%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 5.903%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 11541280GLM-5 (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) today?

Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens GLM-5 (Reasoning): $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.