Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Laguna M.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

55.77/100
No comparison
Poolside
N/A
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 #82 (Estimated); Laguna M.1 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Laguna M.1 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude Haiku 4.5; 4 to Laguna M.1.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
5
Laguna M.1 only
4
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Claude Haiku 4.5 makes more sense if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; Laguna M.1 is the better fit if you need the larger 256K context window or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Laguna M.1 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Laguna M.1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Haiku 4.5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Laguna M.1 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Laguna M.1
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5ΔLaguna M.1
CodingClaude Haiku 4.573.3Margin 8.5Laguna M.164.8
AgenticClaude Haiku 4.5Not measuredMarginNo overlapLaguna M.145.8
MathClaude Haiku 4.54.9MarginNo overlapLaguna M.1Not measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Claude Haiku 4.5B · Laguna M.1
  1. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 73.3%B 74.6%
    Winner: Laguna M.1Δ 1.3
    SWE-bench Verified: Claude Haiku 4.5 scored 73.3%; Laguna M.1 scored 74.6%. Laguna M.1 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5Laguna M.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Haiku 4.5$1 input / $5 outputLaguna M.1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Haiku 4.5Not availableLaguna M.1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Haiku 4.5Not availableLaguna M.1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Haiku 4.5200KLaguna M.1256KLaguna M.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Laguna M.1Result
JobBenchSource 16.0%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 45.8%Not comparable
CodingClaude Haiku 4.5 wins
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Laguna M.1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.3%74.6%Laguna M.1 leads
VulcanBench v3Source 78.3%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 63.1%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 49.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 45.8%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Laguna M.1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 5.903%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Laguna M.1Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1147Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Laguna M.1?

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Laguna M.1 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Laguna M.1?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.3 versus 64.8. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.