Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Mythos 5 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
83.01/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Mythos 5 #2 (Supported); GPT-5.2 Pro #25 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Mythos 5 and GPT-5.2 Pro share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to Claude Mythos 5; 0 to GPT-5.2 Pro.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude Mythos 5 only
15
GPT-5.2 Pro only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Mythos 5 and GPT-5.2 Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GPT-5.2 Pro yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GPT-5.2 Pro is priced at $25.00 input / $150.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $10.00 input / $50.00 output per 1M tokens for Claude Mythos 5. Claude Mythos 5 has the larger context window at 1M+, compared with 400K for GPT-5.2 Pro.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Mythos 5GPT-5.2 ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Mythos 5$10 input / $50 outputGPT-5.2 Pro$25 input / $150 outputClaude Mythos 5 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Mythos 5Not availableGPT-5.2 ProNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Mythos 5Not availableGPT-5.2 ProNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Mythos 51M+GPT-5.2 Pro400KClaude Mythos 5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5GPT-5.2 ProResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 88%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 85%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 88%Not comparable
ExploitGymSource 17.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5GPT-5.2 ProResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 95.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 80.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 88.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5GPT-5.2 ProResult
GPQASource 94.1%Not comparable
HLESource 64.5%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 59%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5GPT-5.2 ProResult
USAMO 2026Source 97.6%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5GPT-5.2 ProResult
SWE MultilingualSource 92.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5GPT-5.2 ProResult
SWE-bench MultimodalSource 54.9%Not comparable
CharXivSource 93.5%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 88.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Mythos 5 and GPT-5.2 Pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Mythos 5 and GPT-5.2 Pro today?

Claude Mythos 5: $10.00 input / $50.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-5.2 Pro: $25.00 input / $150.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026