Skip to main content
benchlm.ai

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 4.8

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

85

VS

Claude Opus 4.8

93

0 categoriesvs4 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #7 · Claude Opus 4.8 #3

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.8
74.9vs80.1

+5.2 difference

Coding

Claude Opus 4.8
72.9vs76.4

+3.5 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.8
68.2vs70.1

+1.9 difference

Multimodal

Claude Opus 4.8
64.3vs76.1

+11.8 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

Claude Opus 4.8

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

$5 / $25

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Claude Opus 4.8 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 85. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.8's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 76.1 against 64.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OfficeQA Pro, 43.6% to 66.2%.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.8 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 85. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OfficeQA Pro, where the scores are 43.6% and 66.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.1 versus 68.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 76.4 versus 72.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.1 versus 74.9. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.1 versus 64.3. Inside this category, OfficeQA Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5 ProClaude Opus 4.8 vs Holo3-122B-A10BClaude Opus 4.8 vs Holo3-35B-A3BClaude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Mythos PreviewClaude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5

Explore More

Anthropic Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: May 28, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.