Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Muse Spark 1.1
Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
Muse Spark 1.1 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
76
Muse Spark 1.1
78
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #8 · Muse Spark 1.1 unranked
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Δ | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multimodal | 65.1 | → 23.3 | 88.4 |
| Coding | 73.0 | ← 11.5 | 61.5 |
| Agentic | 75.1 | → 5.3 | 80.4 |
| Knowledge | 60.0 | → 2.1 | 62.1 |
| Reasoning | 75.8 | — | — |
| Math | 43.8 | — | — |
Operational Comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Muse Spark 1.1
$5 / $25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Quick Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Muse Spark 1.1 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 78 versus 76. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Muse Spark 1.1's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 88.4 against 65.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 69.4% to 80%. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (5)
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 78 to 76. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 69.4% and 80%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 60. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark 1.1?
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73 versus 61.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.4 versus 75.1. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 88.4 versus 65.1. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.