Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 18 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

71.53/100
Margin
28.2pts
← winning
43.32/100
1 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #14 (Estimated); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #159 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B share 18 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive); 11 to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
18
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only
21
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
11
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 18 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 71.53 to 43.32. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 78.6 against 32. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 94.2% to 72.2%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
CategoryClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)ΔNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
CodingClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)78.6Margin← 46.6Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0
KnowledgeClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)60.0Margin→ 16.3Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3
MultimodalClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)65.1Margin→ 11.2Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3
AgenticClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)75.1MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measured
ReasoningClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)75.8MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measured
Inst. FollowingClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)B · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 94.2%B 72.2%
    Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Δ 22
    GPQA: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) scored 94.2%; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 72.2%. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) wins this benchmark.

  2. CharXiv

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 91%B 76.3%
    Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Δ 14.8
    CharXiv: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) scored 91%; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 76.3%. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)$5 input / $25 outputNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Not availableNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Not availableNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)1MNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256KClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 69.4%—Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 79.3%—Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 77.3%—Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 78%—Not comparable
CyberGymSource 73.1%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 44.4%—Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 88.6%45.3%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
GDPval-AASource 49.7%0.0%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
GDPval-AASource 1493465Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
OSWorld 2.0Source 18.2%—Not comparable
JobBenchSource 45.9%—Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource 46.7%—Not comparable
OSWorldSource —47.4%Not comparable
CodingClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) wins
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 87.6%—Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 64.3%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 69.4%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 73.6%13.8%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
AA-SciCodeSource 54.5%27.8%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
SciCodeSource —32%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
MRCR v2 128K-256KSource 59.2%—Not comparable
ARC-AGI-2Source 75.8%—Not comparable
ARC-AGI-3Source 0.2%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 70.3%35.7%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
CritPtSource 12.0%0.0%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B wins
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
GPQASource 94.2%72.2%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
GPQA-DSource 94.2%72.2%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
HLESource 54.7%—Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 46.9%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 53.5%14.9%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 91.4%46.9%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
AA-HLESource 39.6%5.3%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 26.2%-56.0%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 45.8%14.8%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 36.2%83.1%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
MMLU-ProSource —77.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 43.8%—Not comparable
AIME 2025Source —82.1%Not comparable
MultimodalNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B wins
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
OfficeQA ProSource 43.6%—Not comparable
CharXivSource 91%76.3%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 82.1%—Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 78.8%53.2%Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1320—Not comparable
MMMUSource —70.8%Not comparable
MMLongBench-DocSource —57.5%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource —57.8%Not comparable
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source —72.2%Not comparable
AI2D_TESTSource —88.5%Not comparable
RefCOCO (avg)Source —90.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 58.6%63.2%Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads
IFBenchSource —74.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 71.53 to 43.32. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 94.2% and 72.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.3 versus 60. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 78.6 versus 32. Inside this category, AA Coding Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.3 versus 65.1. Inside this category, AA-MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Anthropic Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.