Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
90
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
67
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #5 · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B #20
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.
Agentic
+23.4 difference
Coding
+6.0 difference
Knowledge
+7.7 difference
Multimodal
+11.8 difference
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
$5 / $25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
262K
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 90 to 67. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)'s sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 74.9 against 51.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 54.7% to 21.4%. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 90 to 67. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 54.7% and 21.4%.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.2 versus 60.5. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.9 versus 66.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.9 versus 51.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.1 versus 64.3. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.