Head-to-head comparison across 5benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
85
Qwen3.7 Plus
87
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #8 · Qwen3.7 Plus #3
Pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Agentic
+3.2 difference
Coding
+1.8 difference
Reasoning
+15.9 difference
Knowledge
+0.3 difference
Multimodal
+16.8 difference
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Qwen3.7 Plus
$5 / $25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 87 versus 85. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Qwen3.7 Plus's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 81.1 against 64.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 54.7% to 34.7%. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Qwen3.7 Plus is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 85. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 54.7% and 34.7%.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.2 versus 67.9. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.9 versus 71.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 91.7 versus 75.8. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.9 versus 71.7. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.1 versus 64.3. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.