Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs ZAYA1-74B-Preview

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

90

VS

ZAYA1-74B-Preview

58

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #5 · ZAYA1-74B-Preview unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. ZAYA1-74B-Preview only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
72.9vs53.2

+19.7 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
68.2vs64.3

+3.9 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

ZAYA1-74B-Preview

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. ZAYA1-74B-Preview only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 90 to 58. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72.9 against 53.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 94.2% to 57.3%.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for ZAYA1-74B-Preview. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for ZAYA1-74B-Preview.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 90 to 58. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 94.2% and 57.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.2 versus 64.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.9 versus 53.2. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 11, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.