Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Laguna M.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
71.28/100
No comparison
Poolside
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 #15 (Supported); Laguna M.1 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.7 and Laguna M.1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.7; 5 to Laguna M.1.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude Opus 4.7 only
21
Laguna M.1 only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.7 and Laguna M.1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Laguna M.1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7Laguna M.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Opus 4.7$5 input / $25 outputLaguna M.1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Opus 4.7Not availableLaguna M.1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Opus 4.7Not availableLaguna M.1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Opus 4.71MLaguna M.1256KClaude Opus 4.7 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Laguna M.1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 74%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 65.59%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 20.7%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source 13.9%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 45.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Laguna M.1Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 71.00%Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource 82.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 50.1%Not comparable
FrontierCode 1.1 MainSource 38.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 74.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 63.1%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 49.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 45.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Laguna M.1Result
AA-LCRSource 67.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 5.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Laguna M.1Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 42.7%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 88.5%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 31.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 14.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 43.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 51.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Laguna M.1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 43.793%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 22.917%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Laguna M.1Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 76.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1320Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Laguna M.1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 43.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Opus 4.7 and Laguna M.1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Opus 4.7 and Laguna M.1 today?

Claude Opus 4.7: $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens Laguna M.1: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.