Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Laguna XS.2
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 #15 (Supported); Laguna XS.2 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.7 and Laguna XS.2 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.7; 5 to Laguna XS.2.
Updated July 27, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Claude Opus 4.7 only
- 21
- Laguna XS.2 only
- 5
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.7 and Laguna XS.2 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Claude Opus 4.7 is priced at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Laguna XS.2. Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Laguna XS.2.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.7 | Laguna XS.2 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude Opus 4.7$5 input / $25 output | Laguna XS.2$0 input / $0 output | Laguna XS.2 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude Opus 4.7Not available | Laguna XS.2Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude Opus 4.7Not available | Laguna XS.2Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude Opus 4.71M | Laguna XS.2256K | Claude Opus 4.7 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic5 benchmarks
Coding8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Laguna XS.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 71.00% | — | Not comparable |
| React Native EvalsSource | 82.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 50.1% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierCode 1.1 MainSource | 38.5% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 69.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 57.7% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 46.3% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 35.7% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Laguna XS.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 42.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 88.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 31.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 14.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 43.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 51.9% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Laguna XS.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 43.6% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude Opus 4.7 and Laguna XS.2 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude Opus 4.7 and Laguna XS.2 today?
Claude Opus 4.7: $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens Laguna XS.2: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.