Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking vs GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
59.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); GLM-5 (Reasoning) #52 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and GLM-5 (Reasoning) share 2 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking; 0 to GLM-5 (Reasoning).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking only
0
GLM-5 (Reasoning) only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and GLM-5 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGLM-5 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGLM-5 (Reasoning)$1 input / $3.2 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking200KGLM-5 (Reasoning)200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Coding
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 22.62%23.36%GLM-5 (Reasoning) leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12191278GLM-5 (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and GLM-5 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and GLM-5 (Reasoning) today?

GLM-5 (Reasoning): $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.