Model comparison
Composer 2 Fast vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Composer 2 Fast unranked (Not scored); Gemini 3.1 Pro #87 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Composer 2 Fast and Gemini 3.1 Pro share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Composer 2 Fast; 41 to Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Updated July 27, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Composer 2 Fast only
- 0
- Gemini 3.1 Pro only
- 41
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Composer 2 Fast and Gemini 3.1 Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Composer 2 Fast.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Composer 2 Fast | Δ | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | Composer 2 FastNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.1 Pro77.1 |
| Math | Composer 2 FastNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.1 Pro31.8 |
| Multimodal | Composer 2 FastNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.1 Pro82.6 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Composer 2 Fast | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Composer 2 FastNot available | Gemini 3.1 Pro$2 input / $12 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Composer 2 FastNot available | Gemini 3.1 Pro109 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Composer 2 FastNot available | Gemini 3.1 Pro29.71 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Composer 2 Fast200K | Gemini 3.1 Pro1M | Gemini 3.1 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 Fast | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 57.8% | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | — | 69.7% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 95.6% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 21.4% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 32.0% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 23.2% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 965 | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 56.87% | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | — | 13.3% | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | — | 37.5% | Not comparable |
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning4 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 Fast | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA-DSource | — | 94.3% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 45.4% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | — | 20.6% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (Text)Source | — | 71.5% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 46.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 94.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 44.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 32.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 55.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 49.9% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 Fast | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource | — | 93.2% | Not comparable |
Multimodal9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 Fast | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 83.9% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 80.2% | Not comparable |
| ERQASource | — | 69.4% | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | — | 72.4% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 84.4% | Not comparable |
| ZeroBenchSource | — | 29.0% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (MM)Source | — | 81.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 82.4% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1276 | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 Fast | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 77.1% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Composer 2 Fast and Gemini 3.1 Pro on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Composer 2 Fast and Gemini 3.1 Pro today?
Gemini 3.1 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.