Skip to main content

Model comparison

Composer 2 Fast vs GLM-5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
Z.AI
65.24/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Composer 2 Fast unranked (Not scored); GLM-5 #31 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Composer 2 Fast and GLM-5 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Composer 2 Fast; 48 to GLM-5.

Updated July 28, 2026
Shared results
1
Composer 2 Fast only
0
GLM-5 only
48
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Composer 2 Fast and GLM-5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Composer 2 Fast and GLM-5
CategoryComposer 2 FastΔGLM-5
AgenticComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGLM-556.2
CodingComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGLM-566.3
ReasoningComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGLM-560.8
KnowledgeComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGLM-566.4
MathComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGLM-556.3
MultilingualComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGLM-583.1
Inst. FollowingComposer 2 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGLM-592.6

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricComposer 2 FastGLM-5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensComposer 2 FastNot availableGLM-5$1 input / $3.2 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondComposer 2 FastNot availableGLM-574 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenComposer 2 FastNot availableGLM-51.64 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensComposer 2 Fast200KGLM-5200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGLM-5Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.2%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 57.7%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource 54.1%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 65.6%Not comparable
DeepPlanningSource 14.6%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 38%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 31.1%Not comparable
MCP-TasksSource 60.8%Not comparable
WideResearchSource 69.8%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 98.2%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 43.2%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 14.5%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 50.99%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGLM-5Result
React Native EvalsSource 94.9%74.8%Composer 2 Fast leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.8%Not comparable
SWE-bench Verified*Source 72.8%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 55.1%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 73.3%Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 62.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 46.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGLM-5Result
LongBench v2Source 60.8%Not comparable
AI-NeedleSource 63.3%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 63.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 2.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGLM-5Result
GPQASource 86%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 86.0%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 66.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 85.7%Not comparable
MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source 85.8%Not comparable
HLESource 50.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 39.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 82.0%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 27.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 2.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 26.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 34.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGLM-5Result
AIME26Source 95.8%Not comparable
AIME25 (Arcee)Source 93.3%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2025Source 97.5%Not comparable
HMMT Nov 2025Source 96.9%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 86.4%Not comparable
MMAnswerBenchSource 82.5%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 16.434%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.100%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGLM-5Result
MMLU-ProXSource 83.1%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source 55.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGLM-5Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1274Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkComposer 2 FastGLM-5Result
IFEvalSource 92.6%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 72.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Composer 2 Fast and GLM-5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Composer 2 Fast and GLM-5 today?

GLM-5: $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.