Model comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GLM-4.7
Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B unranked; GLM-4.7 #32
BenchAlign evidence: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B estimated; GLM-4.7 supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and GLM-4.7 share 6 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B; 25 to GLM-4.7.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 6
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B only
- 0
- GLM-4.7 only
- 25
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and GLM-4.7 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
GLM-4.7 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | Δ | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | GLM-4.745.7 |
| Coding | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | GLM-4.775.4 |
| Knowledge | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | GLM-4.752.1 |
| Math | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | GLM-4.71.8 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | GLM-4.7 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B$0 input / $0 output | GLM-4.7$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B60 tok/s | GLM-4.782 tok/s | GLM-4.7 has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B0.84 s | GLM-4.71.10 s | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B128K | GLM-4.7200K | GLM-4.7 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | GLM-4.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 41% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 52% | Not comparable |
| VITA-BenchSource | — | 15.5% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 25.4% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 95.9% | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 39.95% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 33.3% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1165 | Not comparable |
Coding7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | GLM-4.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 37.6% | 45.1% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 73.8% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBenchSource | — | 84.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE-RebenchSource | — | 58.7% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 45.3% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | — | 31.8% | Not comparable |
| AA LiveCodeBenchSource | — | 89.4% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | GLM-4.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 11.0% | 33.7% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 61.5% | 85.9% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 5.5% | 25.1% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| GPQASource | — | 85.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 84.3% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 24.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -34.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 29.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 90.3% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | GLM-4.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1260 | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | GLM-4.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 22.9% | 67.9% | GLM-4.7 leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and GLM-4.7 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and GLM-4.7 today?
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens GLM-4.7: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.