Model comparison
DeepSeek-R1 vs GLM-5 (Reasoning)
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek-R1 #103 (Supported); GLM-5 (Reasoning) #52 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek-R1 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to DeepSeek-R1; 2 to GLM-5 (Reasoning).
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- DeepSeek-R1 only
- 11
- GLM-5 (Reasoning) only
- 2
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeek-R1 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
GLM-5 (Reasoning) is priced at $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek-R1. GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek-R1.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek-R1 | GLM-5 (Reasoning) | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek-R1$0.55 input / $2.19 output | GLM-5 (Reasoning)$1 input / $3.2 output | DeepSeek-R1 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek-R1Not available | GLM-5 (Reasoning)Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek-R1Not available | GLM-5 (Reasoning)Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek-R1128K | GLM-5 (Reasoning)200K | GLM-5 (Reasoning) lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | GLM-5 (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 36.5% | — | Not comparable |
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | GLM-5 (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 20.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 81.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 14.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -27.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 31.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 84.0% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | GLM-5 (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1278 | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | GLM-5 (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 39.6% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek-R1 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek-R1 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) today?
DeepSeek-R1: $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens GLM-5 (Reasoning): $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.