Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 10 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

53.43/100
Margin
23.3pts
winning →
76.72/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) #97 (Supported); Grok 4.5 #7 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Grok 4.5 share 10 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning); 17 to Grok 4.5.

Updated July 18, 2026
Shared results
10
DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) only
2
Grok 4.5 only
17
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Grok 4.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 10 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4.5 is priced at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning). Grok 4.5 has the larger context window at 500K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Grok 4.5
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)ΔGrok 4.5
AgenticDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapGrok 4.583.3
CodingDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapGrok 4.564.7

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Grok 4.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 outputGrok 4.5$2 input / $6 outputDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not availableGrok 4.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not availableGrok 4.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)128KGrok 4.5500KGrok 4.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Grok 4.5Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 37.4%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 83.3%Not comparable
deepSweSource 53%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 45.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 51.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1535Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 1323Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 51.4%Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 40.8%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 13.3%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 32.6%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 81.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Grok 4.5Result
AA-SciCodeSource 39.1%54.1%Grok 4.5 leads
SWE-bench ProSource 64.7%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 78%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 83.3%Not comparable
cursorBench32Source 66.7%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 72.5%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Grok 4.5Result
AA-LCRSource 53.3%67.7%Grok 4.5 leads
CritPtSource 2.0%15.4%Grok 4.5 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Grok 4.5Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 20.7%53.8%Grok 4.5 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 77.9%93.1%Grok 4.5 leads
AA-HLESource 13.0%40.3%Grok 4.5 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.4%26.4%Grok 4.5 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 28.8%52.1%Grok 4.5 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.3%53.5%Grok 4.5 leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Grok 4.5Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 11551328Grok 4.5 leads
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Grok 4.5Result
AA-IFBenchSource 41.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Grok 4.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Grok 4.5 today?

DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning): $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Grok 4.5: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 18, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.