Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

53.43/100
Margin
26.2pts
← winning
Moonshot AI
27.19/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) #97 (Supported); Kimi K2 #189 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Kimi K2 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning); 2 to Kimi K2.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
12
DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) only
0
Kimi K2 only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Kimi K2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Kimi K2 is priced at $0.60 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Kimi K2
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)ΔKimi K2
MathDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K216.1

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Kimi K2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 outputKimi K2$0.6 input / $2.5 outputDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not availableKimi K243 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not availableKimi K21.51 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)128KKimi K2128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Kimi K2Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 37.4%61.1%Kimi K2 leads
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Kimi K2Result
AA-SciCodeSource 39.1%34.5%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Kimi K2Result
AA-LCRSource 53.3%51.0%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 2.0%0.0%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Kimi K2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 20.7%19.4%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 77.9%76.6%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 13.0%7.0%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.4%-27.5%Kimi K2 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 28.8%26.8%DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.3%74.2%Kimi K2 leads
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Kimi K2Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 21.404%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Kimi K2Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 11551083DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Kimi K2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 41.5%41.5%Tie
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Kimi K2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Kimi K2 today?

DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning): $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Kimi K2: $0.60 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.