Model comparison
DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) #97 (Supported); Qwen3.7 Plus #21 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Qwen3.7 Plus share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning); 57 to Qwen3.7 Plus.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) only
- 0
- Qwen3.7 Plus only
- 57
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Qwen3.7 Plus is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning).
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | Δ | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus71.7 |
| Coding | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus75.6 |
| Reasoning | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus91.7 |
| Knowledge | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus60.1 |
| Math | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus92.9 |
| Multilingual | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus85.4 |
| Multimodal | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus81.5 |
| Inst. Following | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus84.5 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 output | Qwen3.7 PlusNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not available | Qwen3.7 PlusNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not available | Qwen3.7 PlusNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)128K | Qwen3.7 Plus1M | Qwen3.7 Plus lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic16 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 37.4% | 93% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 70.3% | Not comparable |
| QwenClawBenchSource | — | 61.8% | Not comparable |
| QwenWebBenchSource | — | 1536 | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 62.7% | Not comparable |
| BFCL v4Source | — | 72.9% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 73.2% | Not comparable |
| VITA-BenchSource | — | 45.6% | Not comparable |
| DeepPlanningSource | — | 62.3% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | — | 73.3% | Not comparable |
| AndroidWorldSource | — | 81.0% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 20.8% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 22.4% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 21.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 936 | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | — | 2.8% | Not comparable |
Coding9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 39.1% | 45.5% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 70.3% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 77.7% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 57.6% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 75.8% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 41.1% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 51.3% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBenchSource | — | 89.6% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 55.9% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 20.7% | 39.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 77.9% | 90.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-HLESource | 13.0% | 33.4% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -28.4% | 2.4% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 28.8% | 22.2% | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 80.3% | 25.5% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| GPQASource | — | 90.3% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 90.3% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 34.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 88.5% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ReduxSource | — | 94.5% | Not comparable |
| SuperGPQASource | — | 71.4% | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multilingual5 benchmarks
Multimodal17 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1152 | 1288 | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 79% | Not comparable |
| MathVisionSource | — | 90.3% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 85.9% | Not comparable |
| ERQASource | — | 69.8% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (MM)Source | — | 71.0% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 79.0% | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | — | 81.7% | Not comparable |
| MMSearch-PlusSource | — | 41.4% | Not comparable |
| RealWorldQASource | — | 86.9% | Not comparable |
| OmniDocBench 1.5Source | — | 91.4% | Not comparable |
| OCRBench V2Source | — | 70.7% | Not comparable |
| ODINW13Source | — | 51.1% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (with subtitle)Source | — | 88.0% | Not comparable |
| VideoMMMUSource | — | 85.4% | Not comparable |
| MLVU (M-Avg)Source | — | 87.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 80.5% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Qwen3.7 Plus on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) and Qwen3.7 Plus today?
DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning): $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.