Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-6 Astra

Updated October 17, 2026. Rank says GPT-6 Astra is ahead. Price, access, and your workload can each overturn that. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.

Share or export
Share on XLinkedInAPI/MCP

Decision reading

GPT-6 Astra has the higher public point estimate, 83.88 versus 63.19. Their conditional score ranges do not overlap. These ranges do not establish rank confidence. 10 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Model A
DeepSeek logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

DeepSeek

63.19/100

Estimated · Public rank #42

Conditional range 48.8–77.5

Model B
OpenAI logo
GPT-6 Astra

OpenAI

83.88/100

Supported · Public rank #3

90% interval 79.4–88.3

Shared results
10
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
31
GPT-6 Astra only
30
Like-for-like categories
2 / 8
Estimated: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 · Supported: GPT-6 Astra. Conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.How the comparison works

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    GPT-6 Astra

    GPT-6 Astra has the higher public coding point estimate, 75.5 to 47.2, with Supported evidence for both models. The conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.

    Confidence: limited

  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    GPT-6 Astra

    GPT-6 Astra has the higher public agentic point estimate, 74.8 to 54.5, with Supported evidence for both models. The conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.

    Confidence: limited

  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    GPT-6 Astra

    GPT-6 Astra has the larger documented context window.

    Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls

  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.

    Confidence: listed-rates

Which one for a specific job

Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.

The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.

47.2DeepSeek V4 Pro 081375.5GPT-6 Astra

Like-for-like · BenchAlign v5.8

GPT-6 Astra has the higher coding point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.

Open the coding leaderboardShortlist models for this job
Same basis rules as the category table below

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

1 category rests on Estimated evidence or different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.

Bars run 0–100 on each benchmark’s normalized display scale

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign v5.8 lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.

Agentic

Like-for-like
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
54.5
Supported · #43/128
GPT-6 Astra
74.8
Supported · #7/128
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 11 vs 14 public rows
Reading
GPT-6 Astra leads

Coding

Like-for-like
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
47.2
Supported · #49/150
GPT-6 Astra
75.5
Supported · #4/150
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 15 vs 6 public rows
Reading
GPT-6 Astra leads

Knowledge

Directional only
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
63.5
Estimated · #41/184
GPT-6 Astra
86.2
Supported · #3/184
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 7 vs 7 public rows
Reading
Directional only

Reasoning

Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
60.7
Unranked · 4 rankable rows
GPT-6 Astra
93.3
#1/28
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 2 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Not ranked
GPT-6 Astra
87.3
Unranked · 3 rankable rows
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Not ranked
GPT-6 Astra
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Not ranked
GPT-6 Astra
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
87.4
Unranked · 4 rankable rows
GPT-6 Astra
97.3
Unranked · 2 rankable rows
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 2 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign v5.8) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the provisional lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.

Supported evidence per lane · bars run 0–100Methodology

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
$0.0033
Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra
$0.035
Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the lower modeled cost

Costs use the listed standard API rates.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
$0.07788
Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra
$0.65
Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the lower modeled cost

Costs use the listed standard API rates.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
$0.0748
Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra
$0.9
Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the lower modeled cost

Costs use the listed standard API rates.

Cached input falls back to the list input rate only where a cached rate is unpublished

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

Reasoning profile

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

Reasoning

GPT-6 Astra

Reasoning

Weight access

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

Open Weight

GPT-6 Astra

Proprietary

License

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

Open Weight

GPT-6 Astra

Proprietary

Release date

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

2026-08-13

GPT-6 Astra

2026-09-03

If you already use one of these models

Deployment change
The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal
GPT-6 Astra has the higher public point estimate, 83.88 versus 63.19. Their conditional score ranges do not overlap. These ranges do not establish rank confidence.
Workload cost
Repository review: $0.07788 vs $0.65. Cache-heavy agent loop: $0.0748 vs $0.9.
Context tradeoff
GPT-6 Astra has the larger documented window (1.05M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra has the higher public point estimate, 83.88 versus 63.19. Their conditional score ranges do not overlap. These ranges do not establish rank confidence. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra has the higher public coding point estimate, 75.5 to 47.2, with Supported evidence for both models. The conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.

Which is better for agentic tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra has the higher public agentic tasks point estimate, 74.8 to 54.5, with Supported evidence for both models. The conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.

Which costs less, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-6 Astra?

For the stated presets, chat costs $0.0033 on DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $0.035 on GPT-6 Astra; repository review costs $0.07788 and $0.65; the cache-heavy agent loop costs $0.0748 and $0.9. Costs use the listed standard API rates.

Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra has the larger documented context window: 1.05M, compared with 1M.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$37,843
Break-even—
GPT-6 Astra
API / mo$45,000
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even—
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence71 rows

Agentic

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081367.9%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081387.9%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • BrowseComp

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081383.4%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra91.5%
    Source

    GPT-6 Astra leads this result

  • HLE w/ tools

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081360.0%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra57.2%
    Source

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads this result

  • MCP Atlas

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081373.6%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Toolathlon

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081351.8%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • CyberGym

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081383.3%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Toolathlon-Verified

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081374.1%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Agents' Last Exam

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081325.7%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra59.3%
    Source

    GPT-6 Astra leads this result

  • AutomationBench

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081331.8%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra41.4%
    Source

    GPT-6 Astra leads this result

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081354.7%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra87.3%
    Source

    GPT-6 Astra leads this result

  • OSWorld 2.0

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra72.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra57.90%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra64.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ExploitGym

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra42.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ApprenticeBench

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra68%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • CWE-bench v1

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra68.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Hermes Index

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra56.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Hermes Bench

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra73.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MazeBench

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra23%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Coding

  • LiveCodeBench Pass@1-COT

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081393.5%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Codeforces

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 08133206.0
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-bench Verified

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081380.6%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-bench Pro

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081355.4%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE Multilingual

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081376.2%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081367.9%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Vibe Code Bench

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081349.93%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081387.9%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • NL2Repo

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081361.5%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • DeepSWE

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081362.7%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra74.1%
    Source

    GPT-6 Astra leads this result

  • DSBench-FullStack

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081371.1%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • DSBench-Hard

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081367.2%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • OpenHarmony Bench

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081359.0%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • LiveCodeBench (Vals)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081387.5%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-bench (Vals)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081396.4%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Main

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra53.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Extended

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra64.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • FrontierSWE v2

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra65.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • PostTrainBench v1.1

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra44.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Bug Hunt Bench

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra45.0 fixes
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Reasoning

  • MRCR 1M

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081383.5%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • CorpusQA 1M

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081362.0%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • ARC-AGI-1

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081390.00%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra98.50%
    Source

    GPT-6 Astra leads this result

  • ARC-AGI-2

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081361.3%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra95%
    Source

    GPT-6 Astra leads this result

  • STEMBench

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra2.81
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ARC-AGI-3

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra62.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • GeneBench-Pro

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra37.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MRCR v2 256K-512K

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra100.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MRCR v2 512K-1M

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra96.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • GraphWalks BFS 256K–1M

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra71.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Multimodal

  • ScreenSpot Pro

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra92.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • BenchCAD Vision2Code (tools)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra0.959
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Knowledge

  • MMLU-Pro

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081387.5%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Chinese-SimpleQA

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081384.4%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • GPQA

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081390.1%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra96%
    Source

    GPT-6 Astra leads this result

  • GPQA-D

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081390.1%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra96.0%
    Source

    GPT-6 Astra leads this result

  • HLE

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081342.7%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • GPQA Diamond (Vals)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081392.4%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • MMLU-Pro (Vals)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081387.0%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • HealthBench (raw)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra56.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • HealthBench (length-adjusted)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra58.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • HealthBench Professional

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra64.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • HealthBench Professional (raw)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra68.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • HealthBench Hard

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra36.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Instruction following

  • Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra8.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Math

  • HMMT Feb 2026

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081395.2%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • IMOAnswerBench

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081389.8%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Apex

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081338.3%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • Apex Shortlist

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 081390.2%
    Source
    GPT-6 Astra—

    Not directly comparable

  • FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra97.600%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813—
    GPT-6 Astra93.684%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

71 public results · 10 shared

Related comparisons

Compare API pricingRead the methodologyOpen the model selector

Watch DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-6 Astra

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

Last updated October 17, 2026