Model comparison
DNA 1.0 8B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. DNA 1.0 8B and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DNA 1.0 8B; 21 to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- DNA 1.0 8B only
- 0
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite only
- 21
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DNA 1.0 8B and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for DNA 1.0 8B yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 32K for DNA 1.0 8B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DNA 1.0 8B | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DNA 1.0 8BNot available | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3 input / $2.5 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DNA 1.0 8BNot available | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DNA 1.0 8BNot available | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DNA 1.0 8B32K | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1M | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DNA 1.0 8B | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 54% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | — | 74% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1140 | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 26.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 32.0% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 634 | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 16.5% | Not comparable |
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DNA 1.0 8B | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 36.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 83.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 17.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 6.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 30.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 33.5% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DNA 1.0 8B | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 79.0% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DNA 1.0 8B and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DNA 1.0 8B and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite today?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.