Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama 3.1 405B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

21.78/100
Margin
29.9pts
winning →
51.71/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 1.0 Pro #193 (Supported); Llama 3.1 405B #102 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.1 405B share 4 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Gemini 1.0 Pro; 7 to Llama 3.1 405B.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
4
Gemini 1.0 Pro only
0
Llama 3.1 405B only
7
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.1 405B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Llama 3.1 405B has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 1.0 ProLlama 3.1 405BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 1.0 ProNot availableLlama 3.1 405B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 1.0 ProNot availableLlama 3.1 405B29 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 1.0 ProNot availableLlama 3.1 405B2.19 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 1.0 Pro32KLlama 3.1 405B128KLlama 3.1 405B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProLlama 3.1 405BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 19%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 11.7%29.9%Llama 3.1 405B leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA-LCRSource 24.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProLlama 3.1 405BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 3.1%8.5%Llama 3.1 405B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 27.7%51.5%Llama 3.1 405B leads
AA-HLESource 4.6%4.2%Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -17.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 51.0%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 39.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.1 405B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.1 405B today?

Gemini 1.0 Pro: Pricing unavailable Llama 3.1 405B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.