Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think vs Llama 3.1 405B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

61.31/100
Margin
9.6pts
← winning
51.71/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think #41 (Estimated); Llama 3.1 405B #102 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and Llama 3.1 405B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think; 10 to Llama 3.1 405B.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
1
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think only
1
Llama 3.1 405B only
10
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and Llama 3.1 405B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 128K for Llama 3.1 405B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and Llama 3.1 405B
CategoryGemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkΔLlama 3.1 405B
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro Deep Think45.1MarginNo overlapLlama 3.1 405BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkLlama 3.1 405BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot availableLlama 3.1 405B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot availableLlama 3.1 405B29 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot availableLlama 3.1 405B2.19 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3 Pro Deep Think2MLlama 3.1 405B128KGemini 3 Pro Deep Think lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkLlama 3.1 405BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 19%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 29.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkLlama 3.1 405BResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 45.1%Not comparable
CritPtSource 25.7%0.0%Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think leads
AA-LCRSource 24.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkLlama 3.1 405BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 8.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.5%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -17.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 51.0%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 39.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and Llama 3.1 405B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and Llama 3.1 405B today?

Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think: Pricing unavailable Llama 3.1 405B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.