Model comparison
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24
BenchAlign evidence: Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think estimated; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think; 38 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think only
- 1
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 38
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Ultra only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 86 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1M for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think45.1 | Margin→ 16.8 | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Agentic | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Coding | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Knowledge | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra54.2 |
| Multilingual | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
| Inst. Following | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot available | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think2M | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 33.2% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 27.4% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1164 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 3.3% | Not comparable |
Coding8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 71.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 49.3% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | — | 36.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 39.9% | Not comparable |
ReasoningNemotron 3 Ultra wins4 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | — | 87% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 21.6% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 37.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 86.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 26.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -0.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 28.5% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 83% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1132 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 86 to 60.
Which is better for reasoning, Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Nemotron 3 Ultra has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 61.9 versus 45.1. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.