Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think
86
Qwen3.5 397B
66
Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think unranked · Qwen3.5 397B #10
Pick Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Reasoning
+18.1 difference
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think
Qwen3.5 397B
$null / $null
$0 / $0
N/A
96 t/s
N/A
2.44s
2M
128K
Pick Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 86 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think is the reasoning model in the pair, while Qwen3.5 397B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 86 to 66.
Qwen3.5 397B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 63.2 versus 45.1. Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.