Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemma 4 26B A4B
55
GLM-4.7
69
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
Knowledge
+11.4 difference
Gemma 4 26B A4B
GLM-4.7
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
256K
200K
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 55. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 60.6 against 49.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 17.2% to 24.8%.
Gemma 4 26B A4B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 55. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 17.2% and 24.8%.
GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.6 versus 49.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.