Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemma 4 26B A4B
56
GLM-4.7
67
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
Knowledge
+11.4 difference
Gemma 4 26B A4B
GLM-4.7
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
256K
200K
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 67 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 60.6 against 49.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 17.2% to 24.8%.
Gemma 4 26B A4B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 67 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 17.2% and 24.8%.
GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.6 versus 49.2. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.