Skip to main content

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

55

VS

MiMo-V2-Flash

60

0 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick MiMo-V2-Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

MiMo-V2-Flash
49.2vs84.5

+35.3 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B

MiMo-V2-Flash

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

129 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

2.14s

Context Window

256K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2-Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

MiMo-V2-Flash is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 60 to 55. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiMo-V2-Flash's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 84.5 against 49.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 82.6% to 84.9%.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 60 to 55. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 82.6% and 84.9%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.5 versus 49.2. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.