Skip to main content

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs ZAYA1-8B

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

56

VS

ZAYA1-8B

62

0 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick ZAYA1-8B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

ZAYA1-8B
49.2vs73.1

+23.9 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B

ZAYA1-8B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

131K

Quick Verdict

Pick ZAYA1-8B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.

ZAYA1-8B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 62 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

ZAYA1-8B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 73.1 against 49.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 82.6% to 74.2%.

Gemma 4 26B A4B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 131K for ZAYA1-8B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or ZAYA1-8B?

ZAYA1-8B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 62 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 82.6% and 74.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 26B A4B or ZAYA1-8B?

ZAYA1-8B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 49.2. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 7, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.