Skip to main content

Gemma 4 E4B vs GLM-4.7

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 E4B

36

VS

GLM-4.7

69

1 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E4B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

Gemma 4 E4B
65.6vs60.6

+5.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 E4B

GLM-4.7

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

82 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

1.10s

Context Window

128K

200K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E4B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 36. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-4.7 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Gemma 4 E4B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 E4B or GLM-4.7?

GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 36. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 58.6% and 85.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 E4B or GLM-4.7?

Gemma 4 E4B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.6 versus 60.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.