Skip to main content

Gemma 4 E4B vs ZAYA1-74B-Preview

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 E4B

39

VS

ZAYA1-74B-Preview

58

1 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick ZAYA1-74B-Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E4B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

Gemma 4 E4B
65.6vs64.3

+1.3 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 E4B

ZAYA1-74B-Preview

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

128K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick ZAYA1-74B-Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E4B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

ZAYA1-74B-Preview is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 58 to 39. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

ZAYA1-74B-Preview gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Gemma 4 E4B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 E4B or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?

ZAYA1-74B-Preview is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 58 to 39. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 69.4% and 68.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 E4B or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?

Gemma 4 E4B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.6 versus 64.3. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 11, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.