Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-4.6 vs GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

55.12/100
Margin
4.7pts
winning →
59.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.6 #85 (Supported); GLM-5 (Reasoning) #52 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.6 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to GLM-4.6; 1 to GLM-5 (Reasoning).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
GLM-4.6 only
13
GLM-5 (Reasoning) only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.6 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GLM-4.6 and GLM-5 (Reasoning)
CategoryGLM-4.6ΔGLM-5 (Reasoning)
MathGLM-4.63.4MarginNo overlapGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.6GLM-5 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.6Not availableGLM-5 (Reasoning)$1 input / $3.2 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.6Not availableGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.6Not availableGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.6200KGLM-5 (Reasoning)200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-4.6GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 76.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-4.6GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 3.09%23.36%GLM-5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-SciCodeSource 33.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-4.6GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 26.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGLM-4.6GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 23.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 63.2%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 5.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -31.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 20.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGLM-4.6GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 3.819%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.128%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.6GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1278Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-4.6GLM-5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 36.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.6 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.6 and GLM-5 (Reasoning) today?

GLM-5 (Reasoning): $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.