benchlm.ai

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) wins overall with a score of 70 vs 56 (14 point difference).Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) wins 4 out of 4 categories.

GLM-4.7-Flash

CreatorZhipu AI
TypeOpen Weight
Context200K
Score56

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

CreatorAlibaba
TypeOpen Weight
Context128K
Score70

Knowledge

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7-Flash

63.8

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

88

66
MMLU
91
65
GPQA
89
63
SuperGPQA
87
61
OpenBookQA
85

Coding

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7-Flash

58

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

83

58
HumanEval
83

Mathematics

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7-Flash

65

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

92

66
AIME 2023
93
68
AIME 2024
95
67
AIME 2025
94
62
HMMT Feb 2023
89
64
HMMT Feb 2024
91
63
HMMT Feb 2025
90
65
BRUMO 2025
92

Reasoning

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7-Flash

62

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

86

63
SimpleQA
87
61
MuSR
85

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) scores higher overall with 70 vs 56, a difference of 14 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 88 vs 63.8.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads in coding with an average score of 83 vs 58.

Which is better for math, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads in math with an average score of 92 vs 65.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads in reasoning with an average score of 86 vs 62.

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.4GLM-4.7-Flash vs Gemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.7-Flash vs Claude Opus 4.6GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.3 CodexGLM-4.7-Flash vs Grok 4.1GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.2