Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs ZAYA1-8B

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

69

VS

ZAYA1-8B

62

0 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. ZAYA1-8B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

ZAYA1-8B
60.6vs73.1

+12.5 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

ZAYA1-8B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

131K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. ZAYA1-8B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-4.7 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 131K for ZAYA1-8B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or ZAYA1-8B?

GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 85.7% and 71%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or ZAYA1-8B?

ZAYA1-8B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 60.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 7, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.