Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-5 (Reasoning) vs MiniMax M2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

59.77/100
Margin
0.3pts
← winning
59.52/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-5 (Reasoning) #52 (Estimated); MiniMax M2.5 #55 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-5 (Reasoning) and MiniMax M2.5 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to GLM-5 (Reasoning); 0 to MiniMax M2.5.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
1
GLM-5 (Reasoning) only
1
MiniMax M2.5 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-5 (Reasoning) and MiniMax M2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GLM-5 (Reasoning) is priced at $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M2.5. GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for MiniMax M2.5.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-5 (Reasoning)MiniMax M2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-5 (Reasoning)$1 input / $3.2 outputMiniMax M2.5$0.3 input / $1.2 outputMiniMax M2.5 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not availableMiniMax M2.546 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not availableMiniMax M2.52.12 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-5 (Reasoning)200KMiniMax M2.5128KGLM-5 (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Coding
BenchmarkGLM-5 (Reasoning)MiniMax M2.5Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 23.36%14.85%GLM-5 (Reasoning) leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-5 (Reasoning)MiniMax M2.5Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1280Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-5 (Reasoning) and MiniMax M2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-5 (Reasoning) and MiniMax M2.5 today?

GLM-5 (Reasoning): $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens MiniMax M2.5: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.